The short answer
In-house product photography pays off when you shoot a steady, high volume all year and can keep a photographer busy; below that, a salary, gear and space are fixed costs that sit idle between drops. Many clothing brands get the best of both by keeping simple flat lays in-house, if anything, and outsourcing the rest: physical shoots to a studio, and on-model images to a done-for-you AI service.
What in-house photography really costs
The photographer
The US Bureau of Labor Statistics puts the median pay for photographers at $44,660 a year, or $21.47 an hour, as of May 2025. The lowest 10 percent earned less than $14.82 an hour and the highest 10 percent more than $44.14. A few things to know before you budget with those numbers:
- It's a median across every kind of photography, not the rate of a fashion e-commerce specialist.
- It's pay only. Payroll taxes, benefits and paid time off come on top.
- It leaves out self-employed photographers, and BLS counts 67 percent of photographers as self-employed. When you hire, you may well be choosing between an employee and a freelancer with their own day rate.
The rest of the crew
A photographer on their own produces flat lays and packshots. On-model photos also need a model, often hair and makeup and a stylist, and someone to retouch. Each of them is another fee, another booking or another hire.
Equipment
A working clothing setup needs a camera body and at least one sharp lens; two or more lights with softboxes and stands; a white backdrop or sweep; a computer for tethered shooting, plus editing software; and a steamer, pins, clips and tape for styling. Ghost mannequin shots add a mannequin and compositing work for every image. None of it is exotic, but it adds up, and it wears out or goes out of date.
Space
Flat lays need a table and room above it for the camera. Full-length on-model photos need far more: enough depth to back the camera away from the model, room for lights on both sides, a wide sweep, and a place to store and steam samples. You pay that rent in quiet weeks too.
Time nobody budgets
Steaming and styling every garment. Planning shot lists. Retouching. Naming and exporting files for each marketplace (Amazon alone uses its own MAIN, PT01, PT02 file names). Reshooting when a new colorway arrives. And the weeks between drops, when the setup sits idle.
Your outsourcing options
A product photography studio
You ship samples, the studio shoots and edits, and you pay per photo or per project. A studio is the right choice for new flat lays, ghost mannequin shots, live models and video. The trade-offs are shipping samples, booking fees or minimums at some studios, waiting for a slot, and license terms: some studios keep the copyright and license the images to you, so check before you book.
A done-for-you AI service
Sellora works from photos you already have (flat lays, ghost mannequin shots or packshots), plus a size chart and 1–3 reference images. We make 7 on-model images per product, and a person checks every image against our acceptance checklist; the first batch is ready within 10 business days, and studio images on a model start from $95 each. No samples move, and on a retainer your brand model stays the same across your catalog. What it doesn't cover: video, real-person campaigns, or new flat lays and ghost mannequin shots. More on on-model clothing photography.
A self-serve AI tool, run in-house
A middle path keeps the work in-house but replaces the model shoot with a self-serve AI tool. Generating and checking every image then becomes someone's job. Here's how tools compare with done-for-you AI.
What outsourcing costs that the price list doesn't show
Outsourcing has its own overhead, and it's fair to count it too:
- Shipping samples to the studio and back, and the days they're away from your team.
- Booking fees and minimums. Some studios charge per booking or set a minimum order, so ask before you plan a shoot.
- Briefing time. A studio shoots what you describe, so someone writes the shot list, sends references and approves the results.
- Consistency across vendors. Switching studios mid-season can change the light, the crop or the model, and your catalog starts to look like two brands. Keep a written image spec (background, crop, margins, model brief) that any vendor can match.
- License terms. Check who owns the images and whether model usage is time-limited before you sign.
None of these is a reason to keep photography in-house on its own, but together they belong in the comparison.
Side by side
| In-house team | Photo studio | Done-for-you AI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed costs | Salary (BLS median $44,660 a year for a photographer), gear, space | None | None |
| Variable costs | Models, stylists, retouching, props | Per photo, plus booking fees and model hours | Per image |
| Samples | Stay with you | Shipped to the studio and back | Not needed: works from your photos |
| Turnaround | As fast as your queue | Shipping and booking first, then the shoot and editing | Within days with Sellora |
| Control | Full, day to day | Shot list and approvals | Brief, references and revisions |
| Best for | Steady, high volume | New flat lays, ghost mannequin, live models, video | On-model images at catalog scale |
A quick break-even check
Start with the BLS median salary of $44,660, then add what the job needs on top: payroll taxes and benefits, a camera, lights, space, models and retouching. Divide that yearly total by the number of finished photos you'd really make in a year, and put the result next to the quotes you get from outside.
So the real test isn't the price per photo, where in-house can win at volume. It's the volume itself: will you reliably shoot enough every year to keep the setup busy between drops? If not, outsourcing costs less, and your fixed costs stay at zero.
Decision checklist
The more of the first list that's true for you, the stronger the case for in-house.
Signs in-house can pay off
- You launch new products every week, all year, rather than in a few seasonal drops.
- Your yearly in-house cost per photo, from the break-even check above, comes out below the quotes you get from outside.
- You have room for a sweep, lights and full-length shots, and storage for samples.
- Someone can own styling, retouching and file prep, not just the camera.
- You need images within hours of a sample arriving, every time.
Signs outsourcing is the better deal
- You shoot in bursts around seasonal drops.
- Most of your spend would go to on-model photos, which need models, styling and casting.
- You need video or live campaigns only a few times a year.
- You want one consistent model across a catalog that keeps growing.
- Nobody on the team wants photography to be their job.
Questions to ask any vendor
- Who owns the images, and is model usage time-limited?
- What does a reshoot or a revision cost?
- What's the real turnaround, including shipping?
- What do you need from us: samples, photos, size charts, references?
A hybrid that works for many apparel brands
Keep the simple part in-house: clean flat lays or ghost mannequin shots on a small setup. The guides on how to photograph clothing for e-commerce and ghost mannequin photography cover how. Send those photos out to be turned into on-model sets, and book a studio for campaigns and video. Your fixed costs stay small, and you pay for a shoot only when you truly need one.
Weighing a photographer hire against outsourcing? Book a call and we'll price your next drop as Sellora photoshoots, so you can compare the two side by side.